What's the over/under we beat USC this year?

[KoolAid]

6.5?

[Unregistered User]

.5

[MBAGuy]

Yes.

[Hates Monikers]

The over is 4, but that's too rich for me. I'll take the under at 6.

[Schnoodler]

was that necessary Kool Aid?

I'll take tails.

[gopherguy05]

Tuesday

[GopherHomer]

funny. I probably made too big a deal out of the 'over/under' misuse...so I'll take my medicine. If this has nothing to do with my rant, then nevermind and I'll take the over.

[KoolAid]

Originally Posted by Schnoodler

was that necessary Kool Aid?

Absolutely not.

Purple monkey dishwasher.

[dpodoll68]

Originally Posted by KoolAid

Absolutely not.

Purple monkey dishwasher.

You misspelled it.

It's actually "puple monkey dishwasher."

[JoeDirt]

I much prefer betting the spreads, Last I saw it was 42%.

[zman]

I'm guessing there is a thread somewhere else that actually helps this topic make sense to us dirty unwashed masses?

[KoolAid]

Originally Posted by JoeDirt

I much prefer betting the spreads, Last I saw it was 42%.

No, you prove anything with statistics - 87% of all people know that

[Unregistered User]

Originally Posted by KoolAid

No, you prove anything with statistics - 87% of all people know that

You truly embiggened this thread with that cromulent post.

[monk10]

Originally Posted by zman

I'm guessing there is a thread somewhere else that actually helps this topic make sense to us dirty unwashed masses?

The only thread that matters:

[AhliBobwa]

There is a formula to figure this out---It has something to do with taking the full sum of Lane Kiffin´s arrogance divided by the apathy of USC´s pampered players in a game that does nothing for them multiplied by how successfully our crowd is able to make fun of Matt Barks, and then add any ridiculous comments Lane Kiffin makes to stoke the fire of our players and feed the apathy of his.

Complicated formula. Haven´t quite put it together yet.

[Jeshurun]

Seantrel Henderson